Hello Casper,
I am happy to find Lenka's query because it touches on the main issue I have had to consider when building my exposition containing 325 video clips, images, text blocks and slideshows. I calculate about 25GBs worth of data.
Do I understand correctly that if I were to segment/distribute my media materials into several pages as opposed to just scattered into the main graphical exposition (let's say "the main loading page"), this total 25GB load is not 'felt' upon accessing the archive? I.e., if the main page as a graphical block only has 1GB and the other 24GBs are distributed into, say, 6 pages (each a block editor) of about 4GBs each, then the load time is just referent to the individual page 'weight' being accessed and loaded and not the entire 25GBs?
This brings other questions on size...
I would like to build a page with all 325 videos as a list view but with the videos as thumbnail sizes. Does this reduce the load time as opposed to having a larger video tool for each?
And if the same video (say, 200MB) appears twice or three times in different places: in the main graphical block and then in two different pages (block editors), does this increase the data volume because each instance counts and adds up to a total of 600MBs or do they work as proxies?
And does your suggestion of a "light version"/"heavy version" imply two separate expositions (each with a unique DOI?), or do you mean a light version for the mainframe (load page) and the heavy version for a separate page linked to within the same exposition?
Thank you!
Vanessa