Sorry, posted this as post in the same thread, but sort of related anyway?

Sharing function "Only for RC users" seems not to work. Logged in users can't see work/research which is shared as that option.

3

(2 replies, posted in Feature Requests)

Agree. I made an image where our (10x15) logo figurates on a wider white space. Excited to see whether that makes a solution.

4

(2 replies, posted in Feature Requests)

We click on the portals list right side column on RC and get directed to a place where a pretty big logo dominates the window. Could these images be scaled down so to get more of the portal's latest activities visible?
See e.g. KC The Hague or Norw Art Res Prog for reference.
Or is the best solution to provide an image which is relatively large in width and small height, like the one Journal of Sonic Studies have used?

luc.doebereiner wrote:

Does the project appear at all on the researchers profile page?

Yes, it seems like only the media thumbnail is missing. I am coauthor in that exposition.

luc.doebereiner wrote:

Did he/she receive a message when he/she was added as a researcher in the collaboration tab?

If you mean message in the message box  "Invitation to research collaboration", then yes. Don't know of other messages.

I am registered as 'researcher' in a project and the only one who can see the thumbnail in use on his profile page is the 'principal researcher'. A bug?

Many tools and functionalities have been added to the RC last years, but there are some things that seem to remain pretty basic. I am thinking of the audio player, which basically is capable of one thing, - to play audio. Before diving into a Feature request of stuff I find a natural need for myself, I wonder if there are very different views on the following:

1. An audio player in RC should/could have wider possibilities to connect text, graphics, images and other to the timeline of the player.
2. A comment function (like the one we know from e.g. Soundcloud) would be a fine way for readers, reviewers and supervisors to engage in the material presented.
3. A player should/could have extended settings as to how and when to start, following certain actions from the one who is reading an exposition.
4. Is it, in the RC context, sufficient with only the stereo track version in an audio player, or could we think of some multichannel use in the future? And then, an interactive mixing functionality?

These are maybe just a few, although maybe not the most important things for a development, I post them here, hopefully they can start a discussion on where we would like to see the sound being dealt with futurewise.